Integrative Islamic Learning Shapes Students’ Religious Attitudes in Social Studies

Pembelajaran Islam Terpadu Mempengaruhi Sikap Keagamaan Siswa dalam Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Sosial

Authors

  • Risha Agustina Widianata Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
  • Mahardika Darmawan Kusuma Wardana Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21070/jims.v7i2.1648

Keywords:

Islamic Values, Integrative Learning, Social Studies, Religious Attitudes, Primary Education

Abstract

General Background: Developing students’ religious attitudes is a crucial aspect of character education in primary schools, particularly in the context of Social Studies learning. Specific Background: Integrative learning based on Islamic values offers opportunities to incorporate moral and spiritual dimensions alongside cognitive and psychomotor skills. Knowledge Gap: However, limited studies examine how such integrative approaches manifest in improving students’ daily religious practices and attitudes. Aims: This study investigates how integrative Islamic-based learning in Social Studies shapes the religious attitudes of fourth-grade students. Results: Findings indicate that students exposed to integrative learning demonstrate significant improvements in cognitive understanding, affective disposition, psychomotor engagement, and the practical application of religious values in daily life. Novelty: This study highlights a comprehensive framework linking Islamic values to multiple learning domains, providing evidence beyond conventional moral education approaches. Implications: The findings suggest that embedding spiritual and moral elements within standard curricular subjects can foster holistic development, guiding educators in designing value-oriented learning activities that influence both classroom behavior and everyday practices.

Highlights:

  • Integrative learning promotes holistic development across cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains.

  • Practical application of religious values in daily life is enhanced.

  • Provides a model for embedding moral-spiritual education within standard subjects.

Keywords: Islamic Values, Integrative Learning, Social Studies, Religious Attitudes, Primary Education

References

Herawati, H. (2016). Pendidikan inklusif: Konsep dan implementasinya di sekolah. Jakarta: Kencana.

Sanjaya, S. (2009). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode penelitian kombinasi (Mixed Methods) (p. 83). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed., p. 16). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(94)90003-5

Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M., & de la Cruz, B. (2007). PRO–ED Series on Autism Spectrum Disorders: How to Use Video Modeling and Video Prompting. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(5), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Carter, E. W., Cushing, L. S., Clark, N. M., & Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Effects of peer support interventions on students’ access to the general curriculum and social interactions. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.30.1.15

Schramm, W. (1954). How communication works. In The process and effects of mass communication (pp. 3–26). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2

Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it’s here to stay. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York, NY: Macmillan.

Freiberg, H. J., & Stein, T. (1999). Measuring, improving, and sustaining healthy learning environments. London: Routledge.

Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2011). Index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools (3rd ed.). Bristol, UK: CSIE.

Hewett, F. M., & Forness, S. R. (1996). The resource room: An outdated model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(4), 432–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949602900405

Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

UNESCO. (2017). A guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. Oxford, UK: Capstone.

Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2015). Models of teaching (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. Wakefield, MA: CAST Professional Publishing.

Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. New York, NY: Bantam Books.

Published

2025-08-12

How to Cite

Widianata, R. A., & Wardana, M. D. K. (2025). Integrative Islamic Learning Shapes Students’ Religious Attitudes in Social Studies: Pembelajaran Islam Terpadu Mempengaruhi Sikap Keagamaan Siswa dalam Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Sosial. Journal of Islamic and Muhammadiyah Studies, 7(2), 10.21070/jims.v7i2.1648. https://doi.org/10.21070/jims.v7i2.1648

Issue

Section

Study Of Muhammadiyah Studies